Timetraveller Jack Slade enters the year 2035, where society has been destroyed by an evil regime. He travels back in time to 1998 to try and save the planet from annihilation.
Bande-annonce
Casting
Brittany O'Neil
Kronos Scientist
Carl Crew
Pastor John
Al Ridenour
Doctor
Christopher James Miller
Gristle
Christopher James Miller
Tracker
Steven Briggs
Duct Factory Creature
Amy Daly
Alien
Robert Diaz Leroy
Shaman
Kyle Morris
Jack Slade
Al Gomez
Kronos Executive
Curtis Gropp
Wasteland Tower Guard
Hart D. Fisher
Bounty Hunter
Steve Dorfman
Dr. Klaus von Watson
Kalise Wallace
Noose
Lisa Thayer
Jack's Mother
Clifford Lee
Bounty Hunter
Sean Stearley
Bill
Auriana-Lynn
Nurse
Jamie Katonic
Khadijah
Vous aimerez aussi
2035: Sauver le futur
The Devil Conspiracy
Superdeep
Don't Speak
American Horror Story
Alien: Earth
The Institute
Teacup
The Woods
Pulse
Bel-Air
The Five-Star Weekend
not the bride he wanted
battle racer
Son of Odin
Monster Aku Terikat Dengan Dewi
The Oval
The Originals
Snowfall
SEAL Team
S.W.A.T.
Siren
L'été où je suis devenue jolie
The Cleaning Lady
Commentaires
10 commentaires
Wow...this is a stinker. Forget the hideously bad odious storyline, for a moment, if one can. This is a schlockfest of an adolescent trying to figure out their sexuality. There is a transgender alien, an Oedipal part, a gang of beautiful women and the protagonist whose only way of saving the world is by sleeping with a goth girl. This is just horrible. Recommended for the confused adolescent. For anyone who is mature in any way shape or form, avoid like the plague. The only reason I gave this two stars is for the simple reason that it's defenders actually admitted that they took part in this travesty. Their courage to admit that and have no shame about it got them the second star.
It'd be hard to spoil this movie since it really gives up having a plot about a third of the way through. Or at least plot is a very very very background element. The attention is then given the visuals which when it isn't showing off its atrocious editing (which is most of the time) are OK, and you can certainly see the Mad Max inspiration. But when the atrocious editing shines through well... well put it this way, definitely not recommended for anyone with epilepsy. The acting quality is not very good either. Most of the characters are underacting and not displaying emotions well, making it difficult to get invested. Especially a problem when the torture of the main character becomes a plot point. One character's over-acting is the only saving grace, providing at least some levity in a movie seriously lacking in humour. In conclusion. Not recommended, to anyone.
Really enjoyed the film, Forbidden Dimensions!!!! I really enjoyed watching the desert scenes!! Along with the lab scenes with the scientists! You could see that the actors were brilliant at expressing their creativity in world of SciFi. Would very much like to see all of these actors expand with their film talents. So much looking forward to seeing them in more upcoming film projects! :) Have a great one and thank you for the excellent film entertainment!!!!!! Anonymous SciFi fan!!!
Worse than a high schooners homemade move. BAD script, BAD acting, BAD camera work , BAD directing.
I grew up in the sixties and seventies when LSD was used to some extent. This movie seems to be one long acid trip. There are mainly references to the Mad Max movies but none of that really matters since there is basically no real story here just a lot of images and sfx that just support a great deal of "trippy" visuals. If you start watching be prepared to be introduced to characters that have no reference to the viewer at all. A mad scientist who can destroy the future of 2035. A naked woman with nipple rings who can stop this by making out with Jack Slade a time warping guy (let's do the time warp again) who keeps going from 1998 to 2035 so he can make out with the nipple ring woman and save the world. If this makes any sense or appeals to you along with lots of sfx and "trippy" visuals then this is the movie for you. I've given it a five for the hard work the sfx people did since that stuff is excellent. But the story and some of the "acting" is just way over the top and while having all the makings of a cult movie it can only be one if you the viewers make it one. Like the movie what the future holds is up to you.
This is my 1076th rating and the worst of all.... So bad that I have to write about it my first review. I am a big fan of : - time travel movies (all of them except this one), - B movies (such as Bad Taste), - Z movies (such as The Toxic Avenger or Rollergator) I can even find some stuff interesting in teen movies. BUT THAT ! No ! There is something insulting to provide such a bad piece of work. No taste, No vision, No style, No interest, No feeling, No fun, Nothing at all. It looks like dady's kid got a camera for chrismass and use his student money to pay one or two friends pretending to act while occasionally film them naked. pathetic. Even "Night Train to Mundo Fine" and "Independence Daysaster" were better. DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ! (Yes Writing in all-uppercase characters is considered "SHOUTING" but can not be avoided in this case).
For me to say all that is wrong with the film, I'd end up writing something longer than the script. This film was abysmal. No one in the film could act. The script was laughable. I truly believe that the budget was spent on the sets and the endless amount of strippers hired to play peripheral characters. I don't hate the film, but there are so many problems with the plot that I was getting a headache just trying to figure out what was going on. The creepiest scene in the film came when the sadly lackluster leading man sees his mother dancing * in a night club....of course the fact that she looked the same as she did forty years earlier was also a head scratcher. Have fun with this one. Totally recommended for a MSTK style viewing.
Forbidden Dimensions is a loving, accomplished (if not entirely period-accurate) homage to '80s straight-to-video science-fiction post-apocalyptic time-traveling rubber-mask monster movies. Story? Let me give it a shot. Jack Slade is an S.E.K.—a "solar eclipse kid"—who finds himself jumping back and forth in time—from 1998 to 2035 and back again. He works for the Kronos Corporation, which in 1998 creates a "wavelength generator" that brings aliens into our dimension. The maniacal Dr. Schector then uses alien tissue to, um, do some stuff, thereby destroying the world. As the last surviving S.E.K., it's up to Jack to find some chick named Khadija in 2035 and stop Kronos and Schector (who looks and sounds like he's fronting an '80s metal band) in 1998. I think. It's weird in spades right from the get-go, and things get even more confusing near the end. I would have preferred a slightly more linear story with less jumping around. But whatever. Overly ambitious? Well, define "overly." I am a big supporter of independent filmmaking and I understand how hard it is to even get a movie made, so I will let an indie get away with a lot of things I'd criticize a big-budget movie for. FD is either unintentionally bad or lovingly bad. I prefer to think it's lovingly bad. Do not take this movie seriously. It is what it is, and it knows it. As such, there's no such thing as a goof. Post-2010 cars in 1998? Crew walking around in the background? It's all good. FD displays all the trappings of a bad '80s movie: shots that last much longer than they should, bordering on indulgent; overly expository, on-the-nose dialog ("I have to save the future!"); actors taking extra time with movements to be sure the camera is seeing it. The dialog is not just unsubtle, but often it seems like characters are having two separate conversations. I love the total lack of adherence to medical reality (the "reverse embryo" scene in particular); that is, the total impossibility of it. It's as if writer-director Chris J. Miller had a bunch of weird ideas and just decided to cram them all in, whether they made sense or not. Evidently a lot of the budget went to practical makeup effects. The weak-of-stomach should probably avoid this one. There is a pact between B-movie makers and the audience, and the director knows it: Namely, if we're going to watch your low-budget movie, we want boobies. Miller delivers. He also gets very good performances from most of the rest of his (non-*) cast, which was unexpected. Detective Giger is a hoot. Based on the trailers on the DVD, I gather he's a recurring character in Miller's movies. Shot compositions are remarkably good, and there's interesting and clever integration of original footage with "guerrilla" footage shot on location at Wasteland Weekend. There are some interesting real-world locations, and even a pretty cool "sci-fi corridor" set. If I have one complaint, it would be the overuse of different fonts for super cards and too many modern video effects. That said, there are enough '80s-era video graphics to satisfy purists. FD features great original music, plus an extra bonus: the same music that Epic Meal Time uses! Is it logical? No. Easy to follow the story? Not really. But is it fun to watch? Absolutely. Final note: If you pirated this movie and then didn't buy a legit copy, you suck. If you pirated it and then gave it a bad rating, there is a special place in Hell for you.
This is clearly a college project, in the same way that THX 1138 is, but lower quality. It tries too hard to be 'artsy', and most of those involved are just beginning their careers (check out the credits). The plot was nonsensical, and no attempt was made to justify or reconcile it, or to make it more clear. THX 1138 was, at times, hard to follow. This is impossible to follow throughout. Poorly written, poorly acted, poorly directed, and the SFX would be B-budget even in the 90's. The music was eminently forgettable, sounding like something one might in the bargain bin of a giant warehouse store. One should not pay to see this movie as it is wholly unwatchable. Two other movies that are equally bad are The Galaxy Invader (1985) and Rock n' Roll Space Patrol (2005). However, these two are worse than their IMDb rating and are not college artsy projects.
I was just wondering, why would anyone produce this film? I think it must have been quite obvious, that after adding all the clips together the final product was extremely terrible. We can congratulate people for trying to make something, and this must have been a fun experience for a group of friends who made it. I would recommend this film only to relatives and friends of those who were taking part in this project, other than that I would urge anyone to avoid this by any means. Verdict: Home made movie for family members and friends, that should have have never been available to larger audiences. Good luck, and let it be a good practice, as there is a lot space for improvement. Regards, Aj
