En 1989, à Toronto, Leslie et Reuben étaient les meilleurs amis du monde jusqu'à ce que la fête les sépare. Cinq ans plus tard, une épidémie de drogue et un enlèvement les obligent à se réunir.
Bande-annonce
Casting
Evan Rissi
Director
Ira Goldman
Reuben
Evan Rissi
Leslie
Victor D.S. Man
Feng
Chanelle Luu
Nora
David John Phillips
The Announcer
William Dao
Tiger
Scotty Murray
Caleb
Alan Shane Lewis
X
Michelle Nash
Marnie
Lorenz Banlawi
Elfrid
Lineen Doung
Kenny
Fallon Bowman
Reporter Erica
Chris Peterson
The Mayor
Neil Bennett
Police Inspector
Rikki Wright
Finn
Justin Tran
Ju-Long
Ryan Dennee
Spidah
Sandy Chen
Tiger's Mother
Evan Rissi
Writer
Vous aimerez aussi
Going In
Marauders
Simulant
Rampage 2 - La vengeance d'un sniper
I, Hostage
The Great Canadian Baking Show
Comedy Night with Rick Mercer
True Justice
Fear Thy Neighbor
La casa de papel
The Day of the Jackal
The Family Business
Reine du Sud
Daredevil
The Punisher
Nemesis
Luke Cage
Cross
Man on Fire
What Lies Beneath
Téhéran
Fauda
Marshals: A Yellowstone Story
Commentaires
3 commentaires
Talent and entertainment packed into a visually epic depiction of the late 80s. Great soundtrack to complement the aesthetics and story line. Character development follows the unique screenplay to keep viewers entertained all the way through. Flashback to classic 80s action with many clever twists. Classic cars, authentic costume design, witty humour, much needed street hoops and squash... Topped off with a great ending and an overall awesome theme that did not disappoint. Imaginably difficult if this was all on a strict budget but the talent pulled it off. Toronto is back on the map cinematically!!!!!!!!
source: Going In
At the movie's intro, the viewer is taken into the world of late 80s Toronto... or what, at least, we're told it is. The plot starts very on the nose of the aesthetics of the late 80s with the characters integrating as they should; living their existences. Then, with the introduction/ reuniting of the two leads aided with alcohol, we see that this world slowly unwinds and descends into absurdity. The movie is delivered straight the entire time - through its performances/conviction - where we still might not know what's intended by the director. Is this on purpose? Do we know if it's a form of satire? Do we know if it could also be totally straight? Do we know why it's... ambiguous on purpose? The characters (and even actors) certainly don't, and that decision swollenly builds from beginning to climax, then through til the very end. For some reason this didn't waver my attention: only sharpened it. After seeing it, my summation is this: To start, the writer was dead set on it being funny, but in a more covert Trojan Horse type way. Secondly, the director shows us this world by its style, conviction, and musical score (oh my god that Tangerine Dream inspired synth) with both action thrills and spectacles. Finally, at the very end, the lead actor shoots off a cheap callback pun to let us all in on it: the 1980s were a total joke. Fitting that all of these three things were done by the same guy. Friggin LOL. Brilliant dick move.
