In the near-future, where constant surveillance is the norm, a group of activists plan an act of urban terrorism, unaware that they may be lured into a trap.
Trailer
Cast
Jonathan Ogilvie
Director
Hugo Weaving
Minister
Diana Glenn
Kylie
Tilda Cobham-Hervey
Winnie
Josh McConville
Conrad
Stephen Curry
Assistant Commissioner
Marlon Williams
Alex Ossipon
Chris Bunton
Stevie
Lawrence Mooney
Father Michaelis
Tyler Coppin
Hippy Karl
Jim Coulson
Toodles
Karlis Zaid
Vladimir
Alexander Gavioli
Young Customer
Roy Barker
Mortician
Steven Kwon
Groom
Betsie Zhang
Bride
Adam White
Bridal Video Operator
Eddie Baroo
Rolli from Magic Carpets
Hamish Ogilvie
Gene from Magic Carpets
Jonathan Ogilvie
Writer
Joseph Conrad
Writer
Maaari Mo Ring Magustuhan
Lone Wolf
Risen
Hearts and Bones
Measure for Measure
The Night of the Comet 2
Love at First Bite
Seven Types of Ambiguity
The Handmaid's Tale
Orphan Black
The Rain
Salvation
The Man in the High Castle
Extant
Into the Night
Counterpart
Invisible
Biohackers
Omniscient
To the Lake
The Undeclared War
Reset
Biohackers
Last Light
The Fortress
Mga Komento
3 Mga Komento
This movie is trash. The writing's bad, the concept isn't, at all, interesting, and it seems to pose as a sci-fi movie -- which, it isn't. This is my assessment, after making it through twenty-nine minutes of this film. To be fair, it is possible that there's some sci-fi element to this movie, and I just didn't bother to stick around long enough to find out what it is. Like I've said, I only lasted twenty-nine minutes. As far as I can tell, the only thing that may be considered sci-fi, is the notion of automated surveillance. If that's the sci-fi concept, then it's pretty thin. I stopped watching this movie because it's painfully boring, and doesn't seem to have much of a direction. After a while, I found myself wondering, "What, exactly, am I looking at?" After turning it off, I read the synopsis, and concluded that the synopsis does a better job explaining the movie, than me actually watching the movie. This is a clear sign of terrible writing. If your audience watches twenty-nine minutes of your film, and is confused about what they're watching, your writing isn't clever, or innovative, it's just bad. After reading the synopsis, I came to realize that I hadn't missed anything. My confusion wasn't due to me not paying attention. After all, the synopsis seems to fill in the gaps and explain what I was watching. However, if I have to read the synopsis, in order to make the movie more coherent, then the writer has clearly dropped the ball. I don't recommend this movie to anyone. Unless you're the writer, or unless you helped create this movie, in some way, or are a friend of someone in either of these capacities, then you're not likely to find any value in this film. I give this movie two stars because, although the writing and execution are terrible, the filmmaker does have competent technical skills. The camera isn't shaky, the audio is fine, the acting is adequate -- things like that. However, that's a low bar, when we're talking about the quality of a movie.
Matrix 4 was a flop, needless to say--pc reboots typically are; Hugo Weaving gave an awesome performance in this peace and if he turned down M4 to do this I commend him for being so discerning. This film is 1000x better than m4.
