تتنكر امرأة في هيئة رجل للانضمام إلى الجيش من أجل حماية ابنها غير الطبيعي من الناحية التعليمية والذي تم استدعاؤه للقتال في الحرب العالمية الأولى.
الإعلان الترويجي
طاقم العمل
Henrik Ruben Genz
Director
Trine Dyrholm
Erna Jensen
Ulrich Thomsen
Feldwebel Meier
Anders W. Berthelsen
Anton Seiersen
Sylvester Byder
Kalle Jensen
Ari Alexander
Max Petersen
Emil Aron Dorph
Mathias Hansen
Mads Ole Langelund Larsen
Christian Poulsen
Aksel Ojari
Fritz Müller
Patrick Descamps
French Camp Commander
Elias Munk
Julius Rasmussen
Jørn Holstein
Train Conductor
Hugo Henry
German Interpreter
David Dumont
Whispering Soldier
Helle Bo
Older Woman Bramstrup
Gert Raudsep
Retiring Feldwebel
Andreas Perschewski
Retiring Feldwebel
Heino Seljamaa
Lieutenant Colonel
Ingo Brosch
Lieutenant Colonel
Bo Hr. Hansen
Writer
Henrik Ruben Genz
Writer
Erling Jepsen
Writer
قد يعجبك أيضًا
إرنا إي كريج
This Life
Before It Ends
خارج الظلام
Boarding House Number 24
Valley of Tears
War Sailor
Das Boot
X Company
Deadline Gallipoli
Shi song hong jun
Blood and Fury: America's Civil War
الفريق سيل
Roots
The Forgotten Army - Azaadi ke liye
Black Crows
جواز السفر إلى الحرية
Chain of Command
فايكنجز
شيكاغو
وينزداي آدامز
Into the Badlands
الساحر
التعليقات
4 تعليق
h
...these are dumb people, who knows nothing of war, and they have high opinions of themselves. Ernas Village has her employed at a special function, which no one ever talks about anymore. Erna has realized certain things about her life and the life of others.. about education and things nobody talks about anymore. Its most of all an anti war film, an Vladimir Putin critique film. Its a NO to USA, a NO to russkyMir, but most of all its a NO to Empires. So in a way one could see this as a predecessor to #StarWarsCloneWars Or as part of #StarWarsRebels most of all one has to pay attention to the great acting, the great directing, and the fantastic filming and cutting. It did not get any Oscars, stupid people in the socalled Academy.
Comparing movies to their literary origins is almost cliché and, some may say, inherently unfair. In this case, however, it does make at least some sense I think. Erling Jepsen has made it his trademark to write absurd stories with a generous dollop of humour - Franz Kafka meets Dario Fo, as it were. "Erna i krig" (the book) is certainly no exception to this, which is exactly why I think the movie needs to suffer this unfair comment. The book treats World War I, the identity crisis of post-Prussia-war (1864) Sønderjylland and social dysfunction in general, as one big absurd theatre linked by one unlikely event after another. This is my main criticism of this movie. These wonderful impossibilities that drove the original story are completely absent. What is left is just a handful of depressing fates in a war long forgotten. A few sausage bribes and funny syllogisms are simply not enough. Add to that, that only a few minor links in Erling Jepsen's original chain of events made it into the movie and an almost cheapish ensemble-like crop of the original cast. All the characteristics that made the story work and (believe it or not) believable have been largely omitted. Disregarding the book, it was a neat little movie, though. Particularly Ulrich Thomsen fit the Erling Jepsen universe of dysfunctional characters oozing insecurity. Everybody else was largely extras - even Trine Dyrholm.
