Walkabout

مہم جوئیڈرامہ
سال1971
دورانیہ1h 40m

Two city-bred siblings are stranded in the Australian Outback, where they learn to survive with the aid of an Aboriginal boy on his "walkabout": a ritual separation from his tribe.

ٹریلر

کاسٹ

Nicolas Roeg

Director

Jenny Agutter

Girl

David Gulpilil

Black Boy

Luc Roeg

White Boy

John Meillon

Father

RM

Robert McDarra

Man

PC

Peter Carver

No Hoper

JI

John Illingsworth

Girl's Husband

HB

Hilary Bamberger

Father's Wife

Barry Donnelly

Australian Scientist

NB

Noeline Brown

German Scientist

CM

Carlo Manchini

Italian Scientist

George Roubicek

Radio Announcer

Edward Bond

Writer

DG

Donald G. Payne

Writer

Nicolas Roeg

Writer

آپ کو یہ بھی پسند آ سکتا ہے

تبصرے

10 تبصرے

WK9oFOJul 17, 2025

Sijui ka mko huku lakin the black boy aliona kasusu ka dem mate ikamtoka move is so interesting wali

Ahmed hatemJun 10, 2025
taysirdomingoJun 10, 2025
Elijah Ķŕiš AmalgamaJun 10, 2025
Mvaiwa ChigaruJun 10, 2025
hynd14May 29, 2023

source: Walkabout

Cynthia Soza BandaNov 18, 2022
Nafz BasaNov 16, 2022

Walkabout

lasizweNov 16, 2022

Two young children are stranded in the Australian outback and are forced to cope on their own. They meet an Aborigine on "walkabout": a ritualistic separation from his tribe. Louis Nowra wrote, "I was stunned. The images of the Outback were of an almost hallucinogenic intensity. Instead of the desert and bush being infused with a dull monotony, everything seemed acute, shrill, and incandescent. The Outback was beautiful and haunting." I could not agree more -- National Geographic cannot make a film more rich and vibrant than this. Roger Ebert asked rhetorically, "Is it a parable about noble savages and the crushed spirits of city dwellers? That's what the film's surface suggests, but I think it's about something deeper and more elusive: the mystery of communication." Is he on to something? I do not know... there is definitely a communication element -- its importance is debatable.

Omah LayNov 16, 2022

This is one of those "art for art's sake" films that were so popular in the 70's (Roeg's "Don't Look Now" is another). Tedious pacing (meant to be "deliberate"), obscure editing tricks (meant to be "inventive"), TERRIBLE, confusing storytelling (meant to be "elliptical"), poorly defined characters (meant to be "symbolic"), in an allegory that probably only Roeg himself understands fully, yet it has people writing (quite eloquent) essays on it. At least the images are beautiful - but then again, how difficult is it really to make a tree or a lake or a sunset look beautiful? (*)