Rendel: Cycle of Revenge

عملجرمڈرامہ
سال2024
دورانیہ1h 39m

'جب 'سمائلی' - 'کرسٹوفر کاکس' نے اپنے مرحوم دادا 'ایڈورڈ کاکس' کے ایک نقاب پوش ویگلینٹ ، 'رینڈیل' کے طویل سائے میں 'والا ڈرگ کارپوریشن' کا اقتدار سنبھال لیا ، اپنے اہل خانہ کے قتل کا بدلہ لیا۔ '

ٹریلر

کاسٹ

JH

Jesse Haaja

Director

Kristofer Gummerus

Rendel

Kristofer Gummerus

Rämö

Sean Cronin

Christopher 'Smiley' Cox

Bruce Payne

Edward Cox

Tero Salenius

Kurikka

MN

Minna Nevanoja

Nina

Kaitlyn Boyé

Fugu

Jessica Wolff

Marla

Mikko Nousiainen

Husky

Jonah Paull

Kid

Jari Manninen

Gert

Jarmo Mäkinen

Horst

JH

Juha-Matti Halonen

Skinny

HS

Henry Saari

Police Chief

Harri Moisio

Editor

MP

Maria Palmu

Doctor

Christian Sandström

Cagevictim

Aake Kalliala

Marsalkka

KS

Kalle Sulalampi

Constructor

PL

Pekka Lehtosaari

Writer

آپ کو یہ بھی پسند آ سکتا ہے

تبصرے

10 تبصرے

user8491759529730Mar 22, 2026
BiG BAZOOKA0 💣🪖Dec 5, 2025

nice

GoyaMenorOct 12, 2024
leticiaimon5@gmail.comJul 27, 2024

I've been looking forward to the sequel to 'Rendel' ever since it was announced. Sadly, I am so disappointed in 'Rendel: Cycle of Revenge' that I'd rather have waited longer. My first big disappointment is the fact the film is in English (and not Finnish as the first one). I suppose they wanted a wider appeal. Pity. Why change a recipe? On the subject of 'wider appeal', they also added comic relief characters reminiscent of Hollywood movies, and they were incredibly annoying. In this sequel, Rendel (once again portrayed by Kristofer Gummerus) continues his revenge against the VALA corporation. The main protagonist is VALA's new leader, Smiley. Actor Sean Cronin, who portrays Smiley, tried too hard to be the bad guy and unfortunately he did not succeed - partly maybe because of a bad script. I also blame the director - who happens to be the same director of 'Rendel' - for lack of vision on this film. Then again, apparently there were so many production issues that he probably is not entirely to blame for this mess. From the story to the characters, crappy dialogue and general bad execution, there honestly was nothing here I enjoyed. Big criticism also go to the titular character, Rendel, who was far too passive in this film - and he never spoke a single word. In fact, the actor himself showed very little enthusiasm and at times came across as lazy - or maybe he just didn't want to do this sequel. All these issues are evident in the end result. This is a poorly made film with a bad script. I think I'll conveniently (try to) forget I've seen this.

Any LoulouJul 25, 2024

I did like this better than the first one- which is like saying I prefer tire sludge over fecal matter. This movie has been a looooong time coming. It's predecessor was released during the height of the superhero film genre in 2017, now during (or after, depending who you ask) the superhero genre's implosion, this finally gets released. Why, was there really that big an audience for this? What I saw this film for was Bruce Payne- the highlight of ANYTHING he is in. Some men are born to play villains and he is one, easily gobbling up scenery with ease and class. But here he is wasted, doing little much at all and then dying. Anyone could have played his role. I saw the 2017 film when it first came out and disliked it for it's over-the-top brutality, so the moment I saw a little boy being introduced in the beginning of this film I knew for a fact he was living on borrowed time. What does Jesse Haaja have against kids? This film was made for American audiences, hence the English language, but nothing else that American audiences like to see- fun, humor, a likeable protagonist who uses brains as well as fists, colorful dialogue, and genuine excitement- all present in another film cashing in on an action genre ("Die Hard" clones) for it's time, "Passenger 57"- which doesn't waste Bruce Payne like this does; watch that movie instead.

user55358560 binta30Jul 24, 2024
C'est Dieu Qui DonneJul 24, 2024

source: Rendel: Cycle of Revenge

CreatorMikkiJul 24, 2024

Loved the story and the animation in the beginning. I thought the story was great and considering that it was done on a low budget, I think it was maximized. My only criticism if you can call it as such is all the lab scenes. I thought that it should have been more slick, Afterall Ala is a rich organization so one would expect the kind of labs you see in a James Bond film not two dirty and silly looking scientist working in a dungeon like lab. I loved the cast, I thought the casting was very well done. The chemistry between the characters was spot on. Cant's wait for a third installment if one is in the making.

LoLo233Jul 24, 2024

It looked decent at the picture, but when i started watching it, it was very very boring. You can tell it's cheaply made, and all over bad. The fighting scenes is slow, the shooting scenes have some sort of "lagg" to it when they fire the guns, and the story is not good at all. This looks alot like someone made this movie/film at home. If they had put some more money in it for the effects, and piffed up the story a little, then maybe it would be a good movie/film, but as it is right now, i dont recommend anyone watching it if you're looking for a overall good action movie to watch. No thank you.

leong_munyeeJul 24, 2024

I watched both movies in the series yesterday and came to the conclusion that the protagonist's folks must have played yoyo with him when he was a child causing him serious traumatic brain injury which must have led to him getting into trouble in the presence of security cameras at his new workplace and finally after becoming the "superhero", getting head protection but no chest protection at all with the net result that he keeps getting stabbed and doesn't ever die. Also earlier on, we were shown opponents hitting him in the head and getting their hands hurt yet in the sequel we see the lady hitting him in the head multiple times with her fists without even wincing. Also I did not understand where the alter ego came from. Did the writer/director suffer from multiple personality disorder?