A game ranger and a team of poachers end up surrounded by zombie animals and they forge an alliance to stop the beasts before the super-zombie virus spreads to the entire world.
ٹریلر
کاسٹ
Glenn Miller
Director
Erica Sturdefant
Brooke Sullivan
Jonathon Buckley
Randy Hock
Jarrid Masse
Toronto
Terra Strong
Jezel
Jumarcus Mason
K.D.
Caleb Thomas
Logan
Peter Stickles
Isaiah
Troy Castaneda
Ranger Mike
Adam Meredith
Ford
Ashley Alva
Layne
Jaime Nungaray
Al
Himanshu Prasad
Rod
Jazz
The Cheetah
Sacha the Urasia
The Lynx
Zuri the Sevral
The Zuzumble
Kim Nielsen
Dr. Ellen Rogers
Brandon Baker
Vedder
Scotty Mullen
Writer
آپ کو یہ بھی پسند آ سکتا ہے
Zoombies 2
Zoombies
Terminator: Dark Fate
Welcome to Sudden Death
Avatar: The Last Airbender
Into the Badlands
S.W.A.T.
Grimm
Outer Banks
Halo
The Umbrella Academy
Vikings: Valhalla
Untitled Arnold Schwarzenegger/Skydance Project
Knuckles
Power Rangers Beast Morphers
Power Rangers Dino Fury
MacGyver
Shogun
The Walking Dead: Dead City
Knightfall
تبصرے
10 تبصرے
zoombies
There's no way around it. This is one terrible movie. Special effects are laughable and incredibly cheap looking and unconvincing. Actors do their best with a terrible script. The women are pretty and they wear tight clothes that show lots of cleavage. So if you're a 12 year old boy that can't access * on your computer, I guess you might like this.
Why would the police not come to help them, when there are armed poachers? The black guy was just over the top silly and whiny. I hope they don't make a part 3.
What is the story, the plot, and how are the dialogues? In the first 6 minutes we see a good performance and dialogues, but when the 3 hunters are surrounded by meerkats, they mistakenly start to develop the story, with a plot twist that everyone expected haha. But you even remain interested, until the dialogues and digital performances of 'The Asylum' begin. Some excelled with great successes and some mistakes of the actors, especially the actors Jarrid Masse, Jonathon Buckley and Erica Sturdefant. The worst are not the actors and actresses, but again the animals that are poorly made and have their behaviors very inconsistent with that of zombies. But the scenery is really beautiful like 'Zoombies'. Final remarks: A film to pass the time, even though I have positive thoughts about the film, we cannot disagree that it is bad in certain aspects, for example the animals themselves that are badly made in relation to the year the film was made. released, we could not expect something like 'The Lion King' (film of the same year), because the budget has a huge difference. The performances are not as bad as some people criticize, remembering that the script did not help the actors and actresses to act so well. On paper it was a beautiful premise, but badly executed!
Same basic premise as the first movie: zombie animals run amok. Like the first one, the setting is good and I think the actors did a fair job with what they had to work with. The science still makes no sense, but the story in this one made a little more sense. The CGI is equally poor. What makes this one a tick better is that there were at least a few interesting animal attack scenes, one of which thankfully saw the demise of a truly obnoxious character.
I gotta admit, I like the title (Zoombies is a combination of "zoo" and "zombies". Duh). "You're a bad mama". Therein lies the problem. "We are leaving". Ah, that's a nod to Aliens from 1986. "The animals are going crazy!" Uh ya think? These are quotes from my latest review, Zoombies 2. "2" is a sequel to 2016's Zoombies. I've never viewed the original Zoombies but I'm thinking that's perfectly fine. I didn't plan on seeing it anyway. So OK, here's the uneven gist with "2": Cartoonish wildlife in the form of zebras, pythons, porcupines, rhinos, hippos, and aardvarks turn into witchcraft corpses and then attack various humans in a faraway jungle (the gophers in Caddyshack and the anacondas in Anaconda got nothing on these toothed, untamed creatures). Clocking in at a choppy 84 minutes and distributed by The Asylum (they're responsible for those Sharknado flicks and the inspired 2006 vehicle, Snakes on a Train), Zoombies 2 only occasionally pushes the envelope the way other zombie pics do. "2" is Roger Corman-like and low-budgeted. "2" is perfunctory Cable watching at 4 am. "2" is akin to 1982 John Carpenter on holiday. Finally, Zoombies 2 is pure camp so I guess you'll have to light up the S'mores, pitch a tent, and keep the home fires burning. With the fake, CGI-enhanced Zoombies 2, director Glenn Miller lets middling to bad acting, dialogue-d grandstanding, and timeline-skewed editing spill onto the screen (how could one character have a bloodied, scratched up face and then be totally camera-ready in the next scene?). His "2" minus a hefty amount of scares, is like a direct-to-video version of Critters, Ghoulies, and dare I say, Jurassic Park (ugh). Add a musical score that was meant for a better film (thanks Christopher Cano and Chris Ridenhour) and some cheesy opening credit titles and Zoombies 2 gets a generous "two" star rating.
Will there be a zoombies 3. I would really hope if there was another movie because I loved the zoombies movies
Its from asylum so from the get go you all ready know its going to be terrible. acting,story,CGI. everything is a typical asylum movie. all they know what to do is doing knockoff bad copy of good mainstream movies. but i guess some people like that kind of bad taste. i would give it a 0 but sorry to say its not an option
The first Zoombie, at least, was bad in a fun way. This is just bad. Period. Wasted my money on this. Bad acting, bad CGI, bad plot etc. You have been warned.
This movie is a like a knock off of Rampage or something of that sort. It is absolutely revolting, everything except the vehicles and the people looks like something out of a video game or photoshoped! Would definitely not recommend!
