Two city-bred siblings are stranded in the Australian Outback, where they learn to survive with the aid of an Aboriginal boy on his "walkabout": a ritual separation from his tribe.
ट्रेलर
कलाकार
Nicolas Roeg
Director
Jenny Agutter
Girl
David Gulpilil
Black Boy
Luc Roeg
White Boy
John Meillon
Father
Robert McDarra
Man
Peter Carver
No Hoper
John Illingsworth
Girl's Husband
Hilary Bamberger
Father's Wife
Barry Donnelly
Australian Scientist
Noeline Brown
German Scientist
Carlo Manchini
Italian Scientist
George Roubicek
Radio Announcer
Edward Bond
Writer
Donald G. Payne
Writer
Nicolas Roeg
Writer
आपको ये भी पसंद आ सकते हैं
Charlie's Country
The Monkey King
My Name Is Gulpilil
Mohenjo Daro
Hitler's British Island
Robin Hood
Le Comte de Monte-Cristo
Saint Paul
Bian shui wang shi
The Gray House
Boundless
Haven
Last of the Giants Wild Fish
Vikings
The Witcher
Legacies
द लॉर्ड ऑफ़ द रिंग्स: द रिंग्स ऑफ़ पावर
Vikings: Valhalla
Kung Fu
Nan bu dang an
All the Queen's Men
Lucifer
Avatar: The Last Airbender
The Chi
टिप्पणियाँ
10 टिप्पणियाँ
Sijui ka mko huku lakin the black boy aliona kasusu ka dem mate ikamtoka move is so interesting wali
source: Walkabout
Walkabout
Two young children are stranded in the Australian outback and are forced to cope on their own. They meet an Aborigine on "walkabout": a ritualistic separation from his tribe. Louis Nowra wrote, "I was stunned. The images of the Outback were of an almost hallucinogenic intensity. Instead of the desert and bush being infused with a dull monotony, everything seemed acute, shrill, and incandescent. The Outback was beautiful and haunting." I could not agree more -- National Geographic cannot make a film more rich and vibrant than this. Roger Ebert asked rhetorically, "Is it a parable about noble savages and the crushed spirits of city dwellers? That's what the film's surface suggests, but I think it's about something deeper and more elusive: the mystery of communication." Is he on to something? I do not know... there is definitely a communication element -- its importance is debatable.
This is one of those "art for art's sake" films that were so popular in the 70's (Roeg's "Don't Look Now" is another). Tedious pacing (meant to be "deliberate"), obscure editing tricks (meant to be "inventive"), TERRIBLE, confusing storytelling (meant to be "elliptical"), poorly defined characters (meant to be "symbolic"), in an allegory that probably only Roeg himself understands fully, yet it has people writing (quite eloquent) essays on it. At least the images are beautiful - but then again, how difficult is it really to make a tree or a lake or a sunset look beautiful? (*)
