House of Seven Belles

DrameHorreur
Année1979
Durée1h 32m

The seven sisters of the outcast LeFleur family try to survive in a post-Civil War Deep South.

Bande-annonce

Casting

AM

Andy Milligan

Director

DB

Dolores Barcia

Aunt Alice

PB

Peter Barcia

Jonathan Harker

EB

Elaine Boies

Victoria

HB

Hal Borske

Judd

JD

Joe Downing

Willy

RK

Randa Kriss

Daisy Mae

LS

Louise Schiumo

Violet

AM

Andy Milligan

Writer

Vous aimerez aussi

Commentaires

7 commentaires

Miss Jey ArtsMay 29, 2023

source: House of Seven Belles

IammohofficialMay 25, 2023
TextingStoryMay 23, 2023

Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity. He sucks. This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it? Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level. Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.

Rishi CholeraMay 23, 2023

Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.

Ada SALIOU Mar 29, 2023

Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity. He sucks. This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it? Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level. Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.

user9755029206812Mar 23, 2023

source: House of Seven Belles

Lolitaps PiankeMar 23, 2023

Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.