Cropsey

فيلم وثائقيجريمةرعب
السنة2009
المدة1h 24m

Realizing that the urban legend of their youth has actually come true, two filmmakers delve into the mystery surrounding five missing children and the real-life boogeyman linked to their disappearances.

الإعلان الترويجي

طاقم العمل

BB

Barbara Brancaccio

Director

Joshua Zeman

Director

Joshua Zeman

Self

BB

Barbara Brancaccio

Self

Bill Ellis

Self - Professor of Folklore, Penn State

DD

Dorothy D'Eletto

Self - Archivist & Researcher

Geraldo Rivera

Self - Reporter

KS

Karen Schweiger

Self - Jennifer Schweiger's Mother

DN

David Navarro

Self - Former Newscaster

DC

Donna Cutugno

Self - Founder, Friends of Jennifer

RA

Ralph Aquino

Self - Retired Detective, NYPD

BJ

Bobby Jensen

Self - Retired Detective, NYPD

EA

Ernie Anastos

Self - Reporter

AR

Andre Rand

Self - Suspect

JC

Jim Callaghan

Self - Former Editor, Staten Island Eagle

JD

Jim Dolan

Self - Reporter

TD

Theresa Doyle

Self - Searcher for Jennifer

EA

Ed Armstrong

Self - Holly Ann Hughes's Brother

Sean Hughes

Self - Holly Ann Hughes's Brother

Peter Hughes

Self - Holly Ann Hughes's Father

Joshua Zeman

Writer

قد يعجبك أيضًا

التعليقات

10 تعليق

JackieApr 5, 2025

From Joshua Zeman who brought us the fantastic Killer Legends (2014) we have a documentary about the urban legend Cropsey. For those unaware it was a name given to a faceless (Not literally) individual who snatched children and resided in abandoned buildings within the forest. Alike many urban legends the story changes dependent on who you ask and where they're from. But instead of focusing on the origins of Cropsey it instead focus's on the true story of Andre Rand a man suspected of abducting and killing a number of children with learning difficulties. A living, breathing Cropsey. The team give a history on the man and the lost children, interviews experts and those involved in the case as well as the usual incorporation of archive news footage and stock interviews. Its all well made, but considering how little they actually have to go on much of it feels like filler and it's all assumptions leaving the viewer with unanswered questions and I found that a tad frustrating. This isn't a water tight case and therefore they could never provide 100% certainty but for this reason it felt like rather flawed subject matter. Regardless the archive footage is very moving and the man in question is rather fascinating. The viewer is left to make up their own mind as to what they believe happened based on evidence presented. Passable stuff, but Zeman's later works are superior. The Good: Well made Great archive footage The Bad: Feels like too much critical information is missing Too short

Pater🔥Mr la loi 🔥Jan 7, 2025
Dinosaur 🦖Jan 7, 2025
rockpujeeJan 7, 2025
Yalice KoneJan 7, 2025
ZOLCHE SIDIBE 😎Jan 7, 2025
Zineb Douas foula 💓💁🏻‍♀️Jan 7, 2025
🇲🇷PRINCESITO🕺🏻Jan 7, 2025
user73912928967Jan 7, 2025
Zinnadene ZwartzFeb 4, 2024